Legal Opinion
Ross v. Warner
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 19, 1978No. 77 Civ. 243 (CHT)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TENNEY, District Judge.
The plaintiffs in this as-yet-uncertified class action have moved to amend their complaint pursuant to Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rules”). In its present posture the complaint charges numerous violations of securities and common law in behalf of a class consisting of all persons who, from January 6,1967 to January 17,1977, purchased the stock of General Telephone & Electronics Corp. (“GT&E”) either on the open market or through an automatic dividend reinvestment service for GT&E shareholders. First Amended Complaint ¶ 3. The proposed…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Alexander Kahan, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Lewis RosenstielCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re Currency Conversion Fee Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Araujo v. John Hancock Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002
- McDowall v. CoganDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- Ross v. WarnerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Robinson v. First National City BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.