Legal Opinion
Ross v. Warner
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 28, 1979No. 77 Civ. 243 (CHT)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TENNEY, District Judge.
In the Second Amended Complaint of this still uncertified class action, shareholders of General Telephone & Electronics Corporation (“GT&E”) allege violations of sections 10(b) and 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b), 78r(a), rule 10b-5 of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5, section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77k (“1933 Act”), and the common law by GT&E, its officers, directors and account ants. 1 Plaintiffs seek to maintain this action as class representatives on behalf of all persons who purchased…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,853 John Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,590 David Segal v. Lawrence Gordon, and Coburn Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Denny v. BarberCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Fischman v. Raytheon Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In Re Initial Public Offering Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- O'BRIEN v. National Property Analysts PartnersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- In Re Alstom SA Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- McFarland v. Memorex Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1980
- Friedman v. Arizona World Nurseries Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.