Legal Opinion

Beahm v. Beahm

New York City Family Court

Decided September 30, 1965PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard L. Midonick, J.

The problem of each of these cases is typical of a welter of others daily being heard and heard again in the Family Court of the State of New York. Involved *901is the resolution of conflicting orders of two different courts directed to the employer of the respondent husband and father. One order is a payroll deduction order made by this court of record (or by the Supreme Court) for support of wife and/or children, under the authority of section 49-b of the Personal Property Law; the other is an income execution under CPLR 5231 (subd. [e]), known as a garnishment under the predecessor section 684…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Morris Plan Ind. Bank of N.Y. v. GunningNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
  2. Goodwin v. ClaytorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. David Belasco Co. v. KlawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  4. Loan Service Corp. v. Bridgeport Lumber Co.New York Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Rowland Hardware & Supply Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Carole K v. Arnold KNew York Family Court · 1976
  2. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co. v. Village of ForestvilleNew York Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Reed v. ReedNew York City Family Court · 1970
  4. Lincoln National Bank & Trust Co. v. ColganSyracuse City Court · 1972
  5. Judware v. JudwareNew York City Family Court · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API