David Belasco Co. v. Klaw
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, Joseph Brooks, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Hew York. Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of' the county of Hew York on the 19th day of May, 1904, as grants a stay of all proceedings in an action in which the said Joseph Brooks is plaintiff and David Belasco and the David Belasco Company, the plaintiff herein, are defendants, until the final determination of this action.
1Opinion of the Court
O’Brien, J.:
This action was brought on December 2, 1903, for the dissolution of a copartnership between the plaintiff and the defendants Klaw and Erlanger, and for an adjudication that the défendant Brooks, a nominal partner, had no interest in said partnership. . On December 9, 1903, the defendant Brooks brought an action in the Supreme Court against David Belasco, claiming to be a partner of said Belasco, alleging that the latter had wrongfully taken a share of author’s royalties and that he (Brooks) had terminated the partnership by notice, and demanding a decree of dissolution and an…
2Cited by20 opinions
- Webster v. Columbian National Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Beahm v. BeahmNew York City Family Court · 1965
- Indestructible Metal Products Co. v. SummergradeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Grammer v. GreenbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- Modernismo Publications, Ltd. v. TenneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.