Legal Opinion

Reed v. Reed

New York City Family Court

Decided June 16, 1970PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillaud L. Midonick, J.

This opinion involves only the issue of counsel fees for petitioner’s attorney in a proceeding for support of dependents. May dependents’ attorneys be awarded counsel fees after the final order for support has been made?

There seems no expertise of legislative draftmanship equal to this vexed problem of procedure. My decision will probably be the subject of appeal no matter what the result or reasoning, and, if. the appellate courts will clarify this basic lawyers’ problem, their help will be appreciated by Bench and Bar.

Four times in the last decade, the Legislature has addressed itself to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beahm v. BeahmNew York City Family Court · 1965
  2. Harvey v. HarveyNew York City Family Court · 1969
  3. Anonymous v. AnonymousNew York City Family Court · 1963
  4. Schneider v. SchneiderNew York Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re Carl G.New York City Family Court · 1974
  2. Brown v. BrownNew York City Family Court · 1975
  3. Mintz v. MintzNew York City Family Court · 1972
  4. Reisch v. ReischNew York Family Court · 1975
  5. McGrath v. ParkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API