Legal Opinion

Judware v. Judware

New York City Family Court

Decided September 6, 1972PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. GI-eorge Follett, J.

The respondent’s employer, the Aluminum Company of America, moves to vacate so much of a payroll deduction order of this court as states as follows: ‘ ‘ This wage deduction order supersedes any wage assignment or garnishee presently in effect against the Respondent. As long as this wage deduction order exceeds 10% of the Respondent’s income, no other deduction may be made without the consent of the Respondent, or order of a court of competent jurisdiction.”

On April 7, 1969, the respondent was ordered to pay $30 per week toward the support of his three children resulting from his marriage with…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Loan Service Corp. v. Bridgeport Lumber Co.New York Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Beahm v. BeahmNew York City Family Court · 1965
  3. Costa v. Chevrolet-TonawandaBuffalo City Court · 1963
  4. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co. v. Village of ForestvilleNew York Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Southampton Hospital Ass'n v. Hampton Cablevision Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Liedka v. LiedkaNew York Family Court · 1979
  2. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Metropolitan Opera Ass'nCivil Court of the City of New York · 1978
  3. Commissioner of Social Services v. John H.New York City Family Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API