Judware v. Judware
New York City Family Court
1Opinion of the CourtJ. GI-eorge Follett, J.
The respondent’s employer, the Aluminum Company of America, moves to vacate so much of a payroll deduction order of this court as states as follows: ‘ ‘ This wage deduction order supersedes any wage assignment or garnishee presently in effect against the Respondent. As long as this wage deduction order exceeds 10% of the Respondent’s income, no other deduction may be made without the consent of the Respondent, or order of a court of competent jurisdiction.”
On April 7, 1969, the respondent was ordered to pay $30 per week toward the support of his three children resulting from his marriage with…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Loan Service Corp. v. Bridgeport Lumber Co.New York Supreme Court · 1961
- Beahm v. BeahmNew York City Family Court · 1965
- Costa v. Chevrolet-TonawandaBuffalo City Court · 1963
- Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co. v. Village of ForestvilleNew York Supreme Court · 1968
- Southampton Hospital Ass'n v. Hampton Cablevision Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Liedka v. LiedkaNew York Family Court · 1979
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Metropolitan Opera Ass'nCivil Court of the City of New York · 1978
- Commissioner of Social Services v. John H.New York City Family Court · 1984