Maywood Mutual Water Co. No. 2 v. City of Maywood
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUS, P. J.
Appeal by the plaintiff from an adverse judgment in an action for declaratory relief.
Plaintiff, a mutual water company, instituted the action seeking a determination that defendant city, rather than plaintiff, must bear the expenses of relocating certain portions of plaintiff’s water distribution system in connection with the improvement of streets within plaintiff’s service area. The case was tried on stipulated facts.
Plaintiff was established in 1920 for the purpose of providing water service to- the inhabitants of an unincorporated area of Los Angeles County which is now…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cave v. CraftsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- Marr v. Postal Union Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Neff v. ErnstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Fristoe v. DrapeauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Rubio Cañon Land & Water Ass'n v. EverettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- East Bay Mununicipal Utility District v. Richmond Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- State ex rel. Department of Water Resources v. Texaco, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972
- Southern Cal. Edison Co. v. SevernsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019