Legal Opinion
East Bay Mununicipal Utility District v. Richmond Redevelopment Agency
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 15, 1975No. Civ. No. 34933PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHRISTIAN, J.
East Bay Municipal Utility District (hereinafter EBMUD) appeals from a judgment denying recovery from respondent Richmond Redevelopment Agency of the cost of relocating certain water mains in streets of the City of Richmond.
The Richmond Redevelopment Agency was created under the Community Redevelopment Law. (Health & Saf. Code, § 33000 et seq.); its powers are those conferred by statute. (See Health & Saf. Code, § 33122.) EBMUD is a municipal utility district created as authorized by the Municipal Utility District Act (Pub. Util. Code, § 11501 et seq.); it exercises a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- New Orleans Gas Light Co. v. Drainage Commission of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Southern California Gas Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- In re the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
- County of Contra Costa v. Central Contra Costa Sanitary DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Boise Redevelopment AgencyIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
- City of San Pablo v. East Bay Municipal Utility DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- East Bay Municipal Utility District v. Richmond Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979