Legal Opinion

Tereance D. Ex Rel. Wanda D. v. School District

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 5, 2008No. Civil Action 07-4166PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum and Order

YOHN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Tereance D. and Wanda D. bring this five-count action against the School District of Philadelphia (the “District”) for failing to provide Tereance with a free appropriate public education (“FAPE”) and for discriminating against Tereance. The court presently considers plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment as to Count II, which seeks compensatory education. For the reasons explained below, the court will grant plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and reverse the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Special Education Due Process Appeals Review…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. P.P. Ex Rel. Michael P. v. West Chester Area School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  2. Steven I. v. Central Bucks School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API