Yokoyama v. Midland National Life Insurance
District Court, D. Hawaii
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ACCEPTING IN PART AND REJECTING IN PART MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING EXPERT TESTIMONY AND CLASS CERTIFICATION
SEABRIGHT, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Leatrice Yokoyama, Catherine Thomson, and Edna Yamane (collectively “Plaintiffs”) move for class certification in an action alleging violations of Hawaii Revised Statutes (“HRS”) § 480-2 in the sale of annuities and claiming treble damages and attorneys’ fees under HRS § 480-13(b). As part of their motion, Plaintiffs rely on the testimony of Dr. Craig McCann. Defendant Midland National Life Insurance Company…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Jose Francisco Reyna-Tapia, AKA Jose ReynaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Yokoyama v. Midland National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Federal Insurance v. Sammons Financial Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2009
- Yokoyama v. Midland NationalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Yokoyama v. Midland NationalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009