Legal Opinion
Yokoyama v. Midland National
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 8, 2010No. 07-16825Published
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT GARY YOKOYAMA, ATTORNEY IN FACT FOR LEATRICE C. YOKOYAMA, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF A CLASS OF SIMILARLY SITUATED No. 07-16825 PERSONS, CATHERINE THORSON; D.C. No. EDNA YAMANE, Plaintiffs-Appellants, CV-05-00303-JMS ORDER AND v. OPINION MIDLAND NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii J. Michael Seabright, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted November 20, 2008—Honolulu, Hawaii Filed February 8, 2010 Before: Mary M.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- In Re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Smilow v. Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.