Legal Opinion

In Re Fontino

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 27, 1933No. Docket No. 1295PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

On the seventeenth day of March, 1928, the above-named petitioner was arraigned upon an information in the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, charging that on or about the fifth day of February, 1928, he committed the crime of receiving stolen goods, a felony. The same information charged that the prisoner, on the twelfth day of April, 1925, had been convicted of the crime of burglary, and sentenced to a term of three years in the state penitentiary in the state of Oklahoma; also, that on or about the twelfth day of October, 1922, the defendant had been convicted of the crime of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. DawsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Hickman v. FentonNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  3. In Re BoatwrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. People v. ArnestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. In Re GarrityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. People v. YsabelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. In Re PedriniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. People v. MurrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. People v. StrattonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API