In Re Pedrini
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.
Petitioner, an inmate of Folsom State Prison, is confined under sentences upon conviction of four crimes. One of these sentences is for life imprisonment; three are indeterminate sentences with no maximum specified by *877statute. By this application for habeas corpus petitioner questions the validity-and effect of certain orders of the, trial court purporting to determine whether the sentences, as severally related to each other, are to run concurrently or consecutively. It is petitioner’s principal contention that a sentence of imprisonment for life cannot run consecutively to indeterminate…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. DaughertySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- People v. FerlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- People v. McAllisterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- People v. McNabbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- In Re CowenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- People v. McCartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. PearsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- In re WimbsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- People v. BehrmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.