Legal Opinion

People v. Arnest

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1933No. Docket No. 1261PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

The defendants were convicted of grand theft and of burglary in the second degree, upon an information in two counts charging them with the two offenses, in the following language, to wit: “That on or about the 30th day of August, 1932, in the county of Placer, state of California, they did then and there wilfully, unlawfully and feloniously steal and take the following described property, to-wit: 9 cases of cigarettes, of the reasonable and fair market value of $576.00, which said cases of cigarettes were then and there in the possession of the Southern Pacific Company, a corporation, as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. HinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. People v. DawsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. The People v. BonfantiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902
  5. People v. DoughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Wright v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People v. MortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. People v. ReimringerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. People v. MurrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API