Orchardson v. Christie
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Willis.1. Morrison, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.
This appeal is from the judgment and is presented on the judgment-roll. The action was brought to recover possession of 110 oil paintings and other pictures, of which the plaintiff was the owner and entitled to their possession, and which were wrongfully detained from him by the defendant.
Appellant’s first point is that some of the pictures were not named in the complaint. The judgment purports to be for 105 of these pictures, and they are named in the judgment. Those which are not named in the complaint are definitely referred to as being pictures made by the plaintiff and at that time held…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Berson v. NunanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Claudius v. AguirreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Stewart v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Erreca v. MeyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Meads, Seaman & Co. v. LasarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Englert v. Ivac Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- Casa Nido Partnership v. KwonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022