Legal Opinion

Inga v. Blum

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 15, 1933No. Docket No. 1056PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

This is a motion to dismiss the appeal or affirm the judgment made under section 3, Rule V, of the Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal. The motion is based upon the contention that the appeal was taken for delay only and presents no substantial questions for review, and upon the further ground that appellant’s opening brief does not contain the statement required by Rule VIII, section 2, of the rules governing this court.

The appellant’s opening brief contains a sufficient compliance with the rule last referred to.

This is an appeal from a judgment in an action in claim…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brown v. GowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles-Inyo Farms Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hall v. WolfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Birkhofer v. KrummCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Rogers v. BurnhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API