Legal Opinion

Abraham v. Parkins

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 20, 1940No. 813PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIBSON, District Judge.

The complaint attacks the merger of the McKeesport Tin Plate Company and the National Can Company in March of 1937, the surviving company being the McKeesport Tin Plate Corporation, a corporation of the State of Delaware. The Tin Plate Corporation has been made a defendant with nine individual defendants, all of whom were directors of the Tin Plate Company at the time of the merger, and three were also directors of the National Can Company. The complaint alleges that one of the plaintiffs is the owner of 240 shares of stock of the Tin Plate Corporation, and the other of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. United Copper Securities Co. v. Amalgamated Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Overfield v. Pennroad CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  5. Stone v. Holly Hill Fruit Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Weiss v. SUNASCO INCORPORATEDDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Escoett v. Aldecress Country ClubSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  3. Mayer v. AdamsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1958
  4. Varanelli v. WoodDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
  5. Norte & Co. v. KrockDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API