Legal Opinion

Stone v. Holly Hill Fruit Products, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 9, 1932No. 6254PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.

The amended stockholders’ bill of Edith L. Stone and four others owning altogether about 2 per cent, of the capital stock of Holly Hill Fruit Products, Inc., which was brought against the corporation and certain officers accused of misconduct and prayed for injunction, a receiver and general relief, was dismissed on motion of the corporation, and complainants appeal.

One ground of the motion was that the bill complains of corporate mismanagement and does not show that the complaining stockholders had exhausted their remedies within the corporation. The bill, filed a few…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Delaware & Hudson Co. v. Albany & Susquehanna RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Corbus v. Alaska Treadwell Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Doctor v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. Dimpfell v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Guilford Glazer v. Jerome S. Glazer and Louis A. Glazer, Jerome S. Glazer and Louis A. Glazer v. Guilford GlazerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  2. Saigh Ex Rel. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. BuschMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. Escoett v. Aldecress Country ClubSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  4. Levitan v. StoutDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1951
  5. Schein v. ChasenSupreme Court of Florida · 1975

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API