Legal Opinion

Consolidated Realty Corp. v. Koon

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 11, 1939PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.

Upon tbis record tbe judgment below cannot be sustained.

Tbe statute, C. S., 626, provides that: “Tbe parties to tbe question in difference which might be tbe subject of civil action may, without action, agree upon a case containing tbe facts upon which the controversy depends, and present a submission of tbe same to any court which would have jurisdiction if an action bad been brought.” It further provides that: “The judge shall bear and determine the case, and render judgment thereon as if an action were pending.”

Tbe purpose of tbe statute is to dispense witb the formalities of a summons,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McKethan v. . RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  2. Overman v. . SimsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  3. Waters v. . BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  4. Wagoner v. . SaintsingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. Consolidated Realty Corp. v. KoonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Greensboro v. WallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  2. Board of Health v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Edwards v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Peel v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. Guntert v. RichardsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API