Legal Opinion

Edwards v. City of Raleigh

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 14, 1954No. 451PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

Parties through their counsel may make stipulations of fact. Harrill v. R. R., 144 N.C. 542, 57 S.E. 382; Lumber Co. v. Lumber Co., 137 N.C. 431, 49 S.E. 946. Where a ease is submitted upon an agreed statement of facts, the agreement as to the facts must stand unless set aside for fraud or mutual mistake. Lumber Co. v. Lumber Co., supra; Hood v. Johnson, 208 N.C. 77, 178 S.E. 855; Hood v. Johnson, 209 N.C. 112, 182 S.E. 709.

Such submission is in effect a request by the litigants that judgment be entered in accordance with the law as applied to the agreed facts. Auto Co. v. Ins. Co., 239 N.C.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. City of Raleigh v. EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Lumber Co. v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Emry v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  5. U Drive It Auto Co. v. Atlantic Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Blackwelder v. State Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Askew v. LEONARD TIRE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Town of Hillsborough v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  4. City of Greensboro v. WallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. Moore v. HumphreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API