Legal Opinion

State v. Suddreth

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 24, 1943PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborNE, J.

Tbe record on this appeal fails to support defendant’s exceptive assignment to tbe denial of bis motion to quasb tbe bill of indictment for that, while bis appeal from a judgment of Recorder’s Court upon warrant charging unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor for tbe purpose of sale on 25 December, 1942, was pending in Superior Court, that court did not have jurisdiction to try him on a bill of indictment, of latter date than tbe warrant, charging tbe same offense. Tbe record contains nothing to show that tbe offenses are tbe same. There is no admission or finding of fact to this effect,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. . GibsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. State v. . TrippeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. State v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. State v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. D & W, INC. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. State v. AndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. State v. ClyburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  4. State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. State v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API