Legal Opinion

State v. . Williams

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 26, 1941PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

Tbe record discloses that Elliott’s cotton seed began to disappear from bis ginbouse on 23 November and continued to disappear from time to time for several weeks thereafter. Tart made a number of purchases of cotton seed from the defendant during this period. Elliott identified four of the sacks of seed which the defendant sold to Tart as belonging to him. This is some evidence tending to connect the defendant with the theft and permitting the inference that he participated therein as a principal. S. v. Williams, 187 N. C., 492, 122 S. E., 13; S. v. Hullen, 133 N. C., 656, 45 S. E., 513; S.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. . PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  2. State v. . GravesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  3. State v. Hullen.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  4. State v. . RightsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  5. State v. . MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. State v. MainesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. . WeinsteinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. State v. . HolbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API