State v. . Gibson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.
Scrutinous consideration of each of the exceptions taken in behalf of defendant in trial below fails to show prejudicial error in the trial in Superior Court.
We advert to some of the exceptions.
The first is to the refusal of the court to grant motion to quash the bill of indictment, made by defendant after defendant had pleaded not guilty and after the jury had been selected and impaneled. The grounds upon which the motion is based are not stated in the record. Yet in brief of defendant, filed in this Court, it is stated that the bill of indictment should have had the word “intent” in it, and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- State v. . PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1842
- State v. . JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- State v. . MerrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- State v. . ColeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. . GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Gasque v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.