Legal Opinion
State Teachers Retirement Board v. Fluor Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 27, 1982No. 76 Civ. 2135 (RWS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiff State Teachers Retirement Board (“State Teachers”) in this action against defendants Fluor Corporation (“Fluor”) and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company (“Manufacturers”) moved pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a) to file its fourth amended complaint in accordance with this court’s opinion dated March 30, 1982, and pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(c)(2) for an order approving notice to the individual class members in the manner prescribed in State Teachers’ motion papers. Fluor and Manufacturers oppose the motion to amend and stated their intention to move to…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,005 State Teachers Retirement Board v. Fluor Corporation and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Burks v. LaskerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ripplemeyer v. National Grape Co-Op. Ass'n, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1992
- D'Antuano v. City of Niagara FallsDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1997
- DiPirro v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1998