State v. McCloud
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.
Defendant assigns as error the admission of testimony by police officers concerning his alleged in-custody confession.
Upon defendant’s objection to the testimony concerning his alleged confession, the trial court properly followed the procedure approved by this Court and the United States Supreme Court. State v. Gray, 268 N.C. 69, 150 S.E. 2d 1; Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368, 12 L. Ed. 2d 908. There was ample evidence to support the findings of fact, and the findings of fact, in turn, supported the conclusion (denominated a finding) that defendant “freely, understandingly and voluntarily”…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- State v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. FletcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. PruittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.