Legal Opinion
Bulova Watch Co. v. Brand Distributors of North Wilkesboro, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided July 1, 1974No. 67PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAKE, Justice.
The pertinent portions of the North Carolina Fair Trade Act, enacted in 1937, are as follows:
“GS 66-52: Authorized contracts relating to sale or resale of commodities bearing trademark, brand or name.— No contract relating to the sale or resale of a commodity which bears, or the label or container of which bears, the trademark, brand, or name of the producer or distributor of such commodity and which commodity is in free and open competition with commodities of the same general class produced or distributed by others, shall be deemed in violation of any law of the State of North…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Allgeyer v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- New York Trust Co. v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Old Dearborn Distributing Co. v. Seagram-Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Johnson v. Ruark Obstetrics & Gynecology Associates, P.A.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- State v. ArringtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. TolleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Martin v. PrestonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- State v. HuffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.