Legal Opinion

United States v. Reedy

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided September 12, 1977No. CM 435764PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

DRIBBEN, Judge:

Appellant alleges that the guilty plea in this case is improvident because the military judge’s inquiry failed to comply completely with the requirements announced by the United States Court of Military Appeals in United States v. Green, 1 M.J. 453 (1976).

As I read the Green requirements, the trial judge, as part of the providency inquiry in a guilty plea case:

1. must assure on the record that the accused understands the meaning and effect of each condition in the pre-trial agreement (emphasis from the Green decision),

2. must obtain the same assurance from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. GreenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  2. United States v. CrowleyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1977

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. PriceU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1978
  2. United States v. DunbarArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004
  3. United States v. HillU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
  4. United States v. Private E1 MARK S. GRISHAMArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API