United States v. Crowley
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
MOUNTS, Judge:
The issue to be decided in this case is whether the appellant’s plea of guilty was provident when analyzed under the guidelines established by the United States Court of Military Appeals in United States v. Green.1
In the Green case, the Court stated: “We will view a failure to conduct a plea bargain inquiry as a matter affecting the providence of the accused's plea . . .”2
We find that the military judge did conduct a plea bargain inquiry in our case. The inquiry, however, did not contain all of the specific areas of inquiry set out in Green. In Green the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. GreenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. LanfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
- United States v. ElmoreUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. KingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- United States v. AcevedoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
- United States v. WilliamsonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1977
- United States v. PassiniUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
- United States v. CrowleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.