Legal Opinion
United States v. Price
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
Decided February 27, 1978No. CM 436418PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
MOUNTS, Judge:
Appellant alleges that his plea of guilty was improvident since the military judge failed to make a complete inquiry into the accused’s understanding of the following condition in the pretrial agreement:
“The convening authority agrees to suspend any sentence in excess of a dishonorable discharge, total forfeiture of all pay and allowances, reduction to the grade of E-l and confinement at hard labor for eight (8) years.”
The military judge sentenced appellant to a dishonorable discharge, total forfeitures, reduction to E—1, and confinement at hard labor for 20…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. GreenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. HardenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. ReedyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1977
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. SurryU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1978
- Sena v. United StatesU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1978
- United States v. GurganiousU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. PanikowskiU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1980
- United States v. HillU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979