Legal Opinion

United States v. Price

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided February 27, 1978No. CM 436418PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

MOUNTS, Judge:

Appellant alleges that his plea of guilty was improvident since the military judge failed to make a complete inquiry into the accused’s understanding of the following condition in the pretrial agreement:

“The convening authority agrees to suspend any sentence in excess of a dishonorable discharge, total forfeiture of all pay and allowances, reduction to the grade of E-l and confinement at hard labor for eight (8) years.”

The military judge sentenced appellant to a dishonorable discharge, total forfeitures, reduction to E—1, and confinement at hard labor for 20…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. GreenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  2. United States v. HardenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  3. United States v. ReedyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1977

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. SurryU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1978
  2. Sena v. United StatesU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1978
  3. United States v. GurganiousU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
  4. United States v. PanikowskiU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1980
  5. United States v. HillU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API