Legal Opinion

Didschuneit v. Enochs Lumber & Manufacturing Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 19, 1931No. 20471PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The record discloses no valid assignment of the account sued on. While it was agreed among all parties that Bayley & Company might pay to the plaintiff the amount that Bayley & Company owed to the defendants, and charge the same to the account of the latter, there is nothing to indicate any intention on the part of the plaintiff to assign or transfer the account to Bayley & Company; nor does it appear that Bayley & Company had any sort of intention to purchase the indebtedness. Any language, however informal, will be sufficient to constitute a legal…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jones v. GloverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  2. Long v. ScanlanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Palmetto Mfg. Co. v. Parker & AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Davis v. TiftSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  5. Shepard v. ChappellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bank of Cave Spring v. Gold Kist, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  2. McCann v. Dixie Lake & Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  3. Piedmont Southern Life Insurance v. GunterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  4. Loftis Plumbing & Heating Co. v. American Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
  5. Pinnacle Bank, N.A. v. Brown (In re Brown)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API