Legal Opinion
Loftis Plumbing & Heating Co. v. American Surety Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided December 4, 1946No. 31440PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, P. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The plaintiffs in error contend that the court erred in directing the verdict against them because the evidence authorized, if it did not demand, a finding that there was a novation of debtors whereby they were released from all liability for the bond premium sued for and Doullut & Ewin substituted in their place. In the application executed by the plaintiffs in error, requesting the defendant in error to execute the bond with reference to the proposed contract between Loftis Plumbing & Heating Company Inc. and Doullut & Ewin, it was expressly agreed that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Peacock v. HorneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Ferst's Sons & Co. v. Bank of WaycrossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Stonecipher v. KearSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Jackson v. LiphamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Cantrell v. ByarsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- M. W. Buttrill, Inc. v. Air Conditioning Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Marler v. Dancing Water Lakes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Yancey Bros. v. BowlingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- Commercial Credit Plan, Inc. v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Ajouelo v. WilkersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.