Legal Opinion

McWilliams v. Holton

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 8, 1967No. Civ. 29531PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOX, J. *

This is an appeal from an order of dismissal following the sustaining of a demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint without leave to amend.

In his second amended complaint, plaintiff attempted to state three causes of action. The first and second causes of action seek damages for breach of a written lease against defendant Holton; the third is for damages on the theory of conspiracy on the part of defendants Smith and Roger Wright to induce defendant Holton to breach said lease.

By an agreement dated July 6, 1960, defendant Holton leased certain premises to plaintiff for the purpose of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Imperial Ice Co. v. RossierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Wise v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Harm v. FrasherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Nicholson v. United Pacific InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Edwards v. Fresno Community HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Cohen v. RatinoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Dayton Time Lock Service, Inc. v. Silent Watchman Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Alameda Produce Market, Inc. v. Air Nail Co. (In Re Air Nail Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API