State v. Woodruff

OPINION

WEISBERG, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 The State appeals from the trial court’s order placing John Woodruff (“defendant”) on intensive probation. The State claims that the sentence was illegal under Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (“A.R.S.”) section 13-914 (Supp.1998) and Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order No. 89-15 (“Order 89-15”) relating to administrative requirements for intensive probation. For the following reasons, we affirm.

FACTS

¶ 2 In May 1997, defendant pled guilty to two counts of sale of marijuana, and was placed on supervised probation. In August 1998, defendant was…