Legal Opinion

State v. Jenson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 15, 1979No. 1 CA-CR 3343, 1 CA-CR 3345PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAIRE, Judge.

On this appeal from the revocation of his probation, defendant contends that A.R.S. § 36-1002.02E (Laws 1976, Ch. Ill, § 12) is unconstitutional because it violates the due process principles established by the United States Supreme Court in Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 788, 93 S.Ct. 1756, 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1973).

The defendant had previously been convicted of two separate charges involving' the sale of heroin in violation of A.R.S. §§ 36-1001 and 36-1002.02. He was placed on probation on both charges. Subsequently he was found to have violated the conditions of his…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Albert Lopez Gallego v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  3. State v. FreemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  4. State v. PakulaArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. PittsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. FoyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  2. State v. MonacoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  3. State v. OvindCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  4. State v. WoodruffCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  5. State v. ArbolidaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API