Legal Opinion

State v. LaBar

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 3, 1985No. 1 CA-CR 8813PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.

Following a jury trial, the appellant was found guilty of kidnapping and criminal trespass. In August 1984, the court suspended the imposition of sentence on the criminal trespass charge for a period of three years and on the kidnapping charge for a period of five years and placed the appellant on probation. One of the terms of probation required that appellant be incarcerated in the Yavapai County jail for 12 months. In October 1984, while on trustee status, appellant left the county jail after an argument with detention personnel and was later arrested and charged…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. PenaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  2. State v. PenaArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. WaggonerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Pickett v. BoykinArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. RisherArizona Supreme Court · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. StroudArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  3. State v. WoodruffCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  4. State v. LaBarCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API