State v. Hensley
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
31 P.3d 848 (2001)
201 Ariz. 74
STATE of Arizona, Appellant,
v.
Roy David HENSLEY, Appellee.
No. 1 CA-CR 00-0508.
Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department E.
September 20, 2001.
Richard M. Romley, Maricopa County Attorney, by Gerald R. Grant, Deputy County Attorney, Phoenix, Attorneys for Appellant.
James J. Haas, Maricopa County Public Defender, by Louise Stark, Deputy Public Defender, Phoenix, Attorneys for Appellee.
OPINION
TIMMER, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 After Roy David Hensley violated the terms of his probation imposed under "Proposition 200," Ariz.Rev.Stat. ("A.R.S.") § 13-901.01…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. BrewerArizona Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. DawsonArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. GuytanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- State v. RodgersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.