Legal Opinion

State v. Hensley

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 20, 2001No. 1 CA-CR 00-0508Published

1Opinion of the Court

31 P.3d 848 (2001)

201 Ariz. 74

STATE of Arizona, Appellant,

v.

Roy David HENSLEY, Appellee.

No. 1 CA-CR 00-0508.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department E.

September 20, 2001.

Richard M. Romley, Maricopa County Attorney, by Gerald R. Grant, Deputy County Attorney, Phoenix, Attorneys for Appellant.

James J. Haas, Maricopa County Public Defender, by Louise Stark, Deputy Public Defender, Phoenix, Attorneys for Appellee.

OPINION

TIMMER, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 After Roy David Hensley violated the terms of his probation imposed under "Proposition 200," Ariz.Rev.Stat. ("A.R.S.") § 13-901.01…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. BrewerArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. DawsonArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. GuytanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  5. State v. RodgersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API