Legal Opinion

Midcontinent Communications v. MCI Communications Services, Inc.

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided March 16, 2018No. 4:16-cv-04070Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION MIDCONTINENT COMMUNICATIONS, 4:16-CV-04070-KES Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING CROSS MOTIONS vs. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC., d/b/a VERIZON BUSINESS, Defendant. Plaintiff, Midcontinent Communications (Midco), initiated this action naming MCI Communications Services, Inc., d/b/a Verizon Business (Verizon) as the defendant. Midco alleges that Verizon breached its contract and that Midco is entitled to a declaratory judgment under SDCL § 21-24-2. Docket 40. Verizon filed counterclaims for breach of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Donna Krenik v. County of Le SueurCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. LarionoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API