Legal Opinion

Shapiro v. Mertz

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 8, 2004PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

845 A.2d 186 (2004)

368 N.J. Super. 46

Kathleen D. SHAPIRO, a Member of the Township Council of the Township of Moorestown, Plaintiff,

v.

Michael MERTZ, John Gibson and the Ethics Board of the Township of Moorestown, Defendants-Respondents.

Harvey Howard and Larry Anastasi, Plaintiffs-Respondents,

v.

Kathleen Shapiro and Andrew Shapiro, Defendants-Appellants.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued March 24, 2004.

Decided April 8, 2004.

Christopher Norman argued the cause for appellants (Norman, Kingsbury & Norman, attorneys; Mr. Norman, of counsel on the brief).

Christopher P. Leise,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Van Itallie v. Borough of Franklin LakesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  2. Wyzykowski v. RizasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  3. Aldom v. Borough of RoselandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  4. Griggs v. Borough of PrincetonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  5. LaRue v. TP. OF EAST BRUNSWICKNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Randolph v. City of Brigantine Planning BoardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
  2. Klug v. BRIDGEWATER TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARDNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
  3. Mondsini v. Local Fin. Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
  4. Randolph v. City of Brigantine Planning Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
  5. Hughes v. Monmouth UniversityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API