Legal Opinion
Randolph v. City of Brigantine Planning Board
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 6, 2009PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
WINKELSTEIN, P.J.A.D.
In this appeal, we address whether the conflict-of-interest principles embodied in the common law, the Municipal Land Use Law (MLUL), N.J.S.A. 40:55D-1 to -168, and the Local Government Ethics Law (the Ethics Law), N.J.S.A 40A:9-22.1 to -22.25, require a member of a planning board who has a personal relationship with, and owns a home jointly with, the principal of the engineering firm that employs the planning board engineer, to disqualify herself from applications in which the board’s engineer reviews the application and provides…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Van Itallie v. Borough of Franklin LakesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Wyzykowski v. RizasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Aldom v. Borough of RoselandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- KRUVANT BROS. v. Mayor & Council, Tp. of Cedar GroveSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Thompson v. City of Atlantic CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kane Properties, LLC v. City of HobokenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- Mondsini v. Local Fin. Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
- Piscitelli v. City of Jr.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2019
- KANE PROPERTIES v. HobokenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
- Randolph v. City of Brigantine Planning Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.