Legal Opinion
Randolph v. City of Brigantine Planning Bd.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 6, 2009No. A-3031-07T2PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
963 A.2d 1224 (2009)
406 N.J. Super. 215
William RANDOLPH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CITY OF BRIGANTINE PLANNING BOARD, Rose Roberts and Ocean Gold Coast, LLC, Defendants-Respondents.
No. A-3031-07T2.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued December 9, 2008.
Decided February 6, 2009.
Anthony J. Sposaro, argued the cause for appellant.
Jack Plackter, Atlantic City, argued the cause for respondent Ocean Gold Coast, LLC (Fox Rothschild, LLP, attorneys; Mr. Plackter, of counsel and on the brief; John P. Kaplan, on the brief).
Hance C. Jaquett, Somers Point, argued the cause for respondents…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Van Itallie v. Borough of Franklin LakesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Wyzykowski v. RizasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Aldom v. Borough of RoselandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- KRUVANT BROS. v. Mayor & Council, Tp. of Cedar GroveSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Thompson v. City of Atlantic CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kane Properties, LLC v. City of HobokenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- Mondsini v. Local Fin. Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
- Piscitelli v. City of Jr.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2019
- KANE PROPERTIES v. HobokenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011