Legal Opinion
Goljatowska v. Fred W Albrecht Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 15, 1934No. 2378PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*295OPINION
By STEVENS, J.
Sec 8395, GC, provides in part as follows:-
“Subject to the provisions of this chapter and of any. statute in that behalf, there is no implied warranty or condition as to the quality or fitness for any particular purpose of goods supplied under a contract to sell or a sale, except as follows:
“(1) When the buyer, expressly or by implication, makes known to the seller the particular purpose for which the goods are required, ■. and it appears that the buyer relies on - the seller’s skill or judgment, whether he be the grower or manufacturer or not, there is an implied…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ryan v. Progressive Grocery Stores, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Parker v. S. G. Shaghalian & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Inter-State Grocer Co. v. George William Bentley Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Hight v. BaconMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- J. Aron Company, Inc. v. SillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dow Drug Co. v. NiemanOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
- Mahoney v. Shaker Square Beverages, Inc.Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1951
- Gauber v. Canton Provision Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1934
- Ouzts v. MaloneyOhio Court of Appeals · 1951