Legal Opinion

Gauber v. Canton Provision Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 16, 1934No. 2412PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*331OPINION

By STEVENS, J.

The motion in this case does not raise any question as to the mode or manner of the service of summons upon the Canton Provision Co., but raises only the question as to whether there is shown by the petition a joint liability of the two defendants sued; therefore, the question raised by the motion relates to the subject-mater of the action as well as to the jurisdiction of the person.

The cases in Ohio make an important distinction between an objection to the jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the suit, and of the person of the defendant filing the motion. An objection…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Flessher v. Carstens Packing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Goljatowska v. Fred W Albrecht Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. Sparks v. Beacon Journal Building Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1933

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Logsdon v. Main-Nottingham Investment Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API