Legal Opinion

J. Aron Company, Inc. v. Sills

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 31, 1925PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,.

This judgment must be affirmed. Doubtless the purpose for which these goods were required was at least by implication made known to the seller. Whether under the circumstances of this particular purchase any inference is possible that the buyer relied upon the seller’s skill or judgment we deed not decide. For even were the trial court in error as to the existence of an implied warranty that the goods in question were fit for human consumption, bought as they were by description from one who dealt in them, there was a warranty that they were of merchantable quality. If condensed…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ryan v. Progressive Grocery Stores, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. United States v. Hamden Co-Operative Creamery Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  3. Cohen v. Dugan Bros.New York Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Abounader v. Strohmeyer & Arpe Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  5. Goljatowska v. Fred W Albrecht Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API