Legal Opinion
James v. Acre Mortg. & Fin., Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided January 31, 2018No. Civil Action No. RDB–17–1734PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In 2014, Genuine Title went bankrupt, and Plaintiffs' counsel, Smith, Gildea, & Schmidt, began to obtain access from Genuine Title's Receiver to the company's documents and records, including its computer servers. (James , Mem. 3, ECF No. 7-1.) In early 2015, Plaintiffs' counsel used these records to identify and notify affected borrowers and prospective plaintiffs. (Id. 4.) By June 2015, Plaintiffs' counsel was "able to pull data ... that appears to represent ... buyers' names, addresses, telephone numbers, property addresses, settlement dates, lender and in some cases mortgage broker…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fadlalla v. Dyncorp International LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019
- James v. Acre Mortgage & Financial, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2020