Legal Opinion

Iowa-Wisconsin Bridge Co. v. Phoenix Finance Corp.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided March 18, 1942PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Layton, Chief Justice:

The plaintiff in error will be referred to as the Bridge Company, the defendant in error as Phoenix.

*530Phoenix sued in the court below to recover the amounts alleged to be due on two promissory notes made and delivered to it by the Bridge Company, one in the sum of $2,000, the other for $3,125, with interest from their respective dates.

The sole defense relied on was res ad judicata; and in support of that píea there was introduced in evidence the record of a proceeding in the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit entitled, First Trust and Savings…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. StocktonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Carpenter v. LonganSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Kerrison v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Roche v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Shaw v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Pyott v. Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
  2. Wright MacHine Corp. v. Seaman-Andwall Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  3. Epstein v. Chatham Park, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1959
  4. Shrewsbury v. The Bank of New York MellonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2017
  5. Lewis v. HansonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API