Legal Opinion

Pyott v. Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided April 4, 2013No. 380, 2012PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERGER, Justice:

In this appeal we consider whether the Court of Chancery was required to dismiss a Delaware derivative complaint after a California federal court entered a final judgment dismissing essentially the same complaint brought by different stockholders. The trial court held that it was not required to give preclusive effect to the California judgment for two reasons. First, the Court of Chancery held, as a matter of Delaware law, that the stockholder plaintiffs in the two jurisdictions are not in privity with each other. Second, the trial court found that the California stockholders…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. EpsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Baker v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. San Remo Hotel, L. P. v. City & County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. White v. PanicSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. John Cottrell v. Michael DukeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  2. Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System v. WynnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. Willa Rosenbloom v. David PyottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. Westmoreland County Employee Retirement System v. ParkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  5. City of Birmingham Retirement & Relief System v. GoodSupreme Court of Delaware · 2017

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API