Legal Opinion

Tolbert v. First National Bank

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 10, 1989No. A8004-02328; CA A37591PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Plaintiffs in this class action are persons with non-business checking accounts at the defendant bank who seek to recover part of the amounts that they paid as insufficient fund (NSF) check charges between April, 1974, and April, 1980. Plaintiffs alleged in separate claims that the charges were unconscionable, that they were an unlawful penalty and that they constituted a breach of defendant’s obligation to perform its contracts with depositors in good faith. The trial court granted defendant’s motions for summary judgment on the unconscionability and good faith claims, and a jury found for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Best v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tolbert v. First National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Uptown Heights Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Seafirst Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. Harris v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. Uptown Heights Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Seafirst Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API