Legal Opinion

Tolbert v. First National Bank

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1991No. CC No. A8004-02328 CA A37591 SC S36375, SC S36376PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarson, C. J.

This class action involves the obligation of good faith in the performance of contracts. The primary issue is the nature of the good faith obligation owed by defendant First National Bank of Oregon (Bank) 1 to its non-business checking account customers (depositors) in setting and revising, from time to time, the fees it charged to depositors who wrote checks when there were not sufficient funds in their accounts (NSF fees).

The trial court granted Bank’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether it had failed to act in good faith regarding the NSF fees. 2 The Court of Appeals…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Sheets v. KnightOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Best v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Welch v. Bancorp Management Advisors, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. United States National Bank v. BogeOregon Supreme Court · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. Minco Oil & Gas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Wallace v. National Bank of CommerceTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Appert v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  4. Uptown Heights Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Seafirst Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Pacific First Bank v. New Morgan Park Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1994

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API