Legal Opinion

Harris v. Griffin

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 23, 1991No. CV 90-53; CA A66012PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Defendants buyers 1 appeal the summary judgment and resulting interlocutory decree for the plaintiff sellers in this action for strict foreclosure of a land sale contract. We affirm.

The contract was entered into in 1971. It contains a time of the essence clause, requiring annual payments on December 1. The contract document contains a handwritten addition purporting to require plaintiffs “to cooperate with purchaser in any rezoning, platting, subdividing” and “to sign necessary documents for such application.” However, that language was added and initialed only by one of the buyers, who had…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sheets v. KnightOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Lent v. ToweryOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Gordon v. SchumacherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. Legg v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. Tolbert v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Uptown Heights Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Seafirst Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. Uptown Heights Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Seafirst Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. Uptown Heights Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Seafirst Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API