Legal Opinion
Uptown Heights Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Seafirst Corp.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided April 20, 1994No. 9203-02042; CA A75880PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*357DEITS, J.
Plaintiffs appeal the dismissal for failure to state claims of their action for contractual and tortious breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing and for wrongful interference with contractual and business relationships. ORCP 21A(8). We affirm in part and reverse in part.
We take the facts as alleged by plaintiffs, together with the reasonable inferences that may be drawn from them. In June, 1989, plaintiffs entered into a multimillion dollar construction loan agreement with defendant Seafirst Corporation (Seafirst), a Washington bank holding company.1 The loan was made…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Top Service Body Shop, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Badgett v. Security State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Sheets v. KnightOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- Best v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Georgetown Realty, Inc. v. Home InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Uptown Heights Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Seafirst Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Oregon University System v. Oregon Public Employees UnionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Eggiman v. Mid-Century InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Ous v. OpeuCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Uptown Heights Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Seafirst Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994